Start here
Pick one seat.Close one gap.Prove it.
Nine seats is a menu, not a plan. The shortest path from what you defend today to a skill you can show someone is narrow on purpose: one seat, eight gaps, one artefact at a time.
The road
- 1
Pick one seat, and refuse the other eight.
Choosing is most of the work. Nothing here will choose for you, and a person who keeps all nine open finishes none of them.
- 2
Score it honestly.
Four concrete rungs per control, self-assessed, nothing saved. The score is worthless if you flatter yourself, and it costs nothing if you do not.
- 3
Take your gaps. Keep eight.
Rank what came back as absent or partial by one question: would this come up in an interview for the job you want? A list of twenty six is a way to do nothing.
- 4
For each gap, read the control and what it demands.
The objective, its specification, the clause references, and the implementation steps. This is the part that teaches.
- 5
Run it against something real, then write one page.
A finding, a piece of control evidence, a before and after. One page, publishable. Eight of those is a portfolio, and a portfolio is what gets read.
One ask
Find one thing here you think is wrong. An attribution pointed at the wrong role, a rung that does not match how the work really goes, a threat mapped to the wrong control. Tell me which one and why. That is the whole reason this is open to you rather than to everyone.
Tell me what is wrong